Maintaining the annual growth rate is the biggest challenge for developing countries in this era of globalization. A section of society believes that economical support is required by emerging economies from global bodies whereas, others have a different opinion than they need technical assistance and suggestions for the effective implementation of solutions. In my perspective, the better argument rests with the latter because practical aid will make them self-reliant, and advice can provide them better results. However, this essay will discuss both aspects with relevant examples in support of my view.
The primary objective of a developing nation is to achieve self-reliance, which is possible only by technological advancements. These nations have the basic infrastructure for sectors, such as agriculture, industry, and construction, but for their further development, they need resources, namely raw materials, advanced transportation, and energy supplies. The monetary support by the international organization will be a short-term solution to their problems; it will not make them self-sufficient to address these obstacles in the future. Unarguably, technology can provide them the capability of producing necessary resources and fulfill their energy needs. For Instance, the technology support of solar energy to many developing countries by the United Nations has brought significant growth in their industrial sector by reducing their imports of energy resources. Moreover, developed states can guide better implementation of various reforms as they have already implemented them and also can forecast the consequences of initiatives taken by the government of developing countries. Therefore, these two factors are important for achieving self-reliance and gaining beneficial outcomes.
On the other hand, the argument for supporting economic help is that it can help revive those projects which are not getting enough funds allocation. Undeniably, many public and private projects in developing countries, which are not generating profits, need financial assistance. Although these projects cannot rely on monetary support forever, they eventually require the implementation of research techniques and suggestions for achieving sustained growth. To illustrate, despite the economic support from the World bank, many African countries were not able to establish a concrete growth rate in the agriculture sector until they have not adopted the latest technology and suggestions by the International monetary fund. Thus, economic aid could be helpful to restart development projects even though their sustained growth will depend on the technology and advice aid.
To summarize, one can conclude that monetary support could be beneficial for re-starting numerous projects though the growth of emerging economies will rely on scientific research and guidance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ion. A section of society believes that economical support is required by emerging economi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95180722892 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18260805763 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53734939759 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7531511627 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.294117647 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14690184348 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505978785896 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308222398009 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864947774115 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571156489639 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.