Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It has often been argued that dealing with any issues related to environment with international collaboration proves to be more significant rather trying to resolve just within the country. Some problems can be taken care on national level by local authorities, however, significant issues should be cater globally. This essay will shed light on both the views with logical conclusion.
First of all, it has been noticed that the threat of global warming was alarmed, however, no steps were taken. Due to which different countries are facing unwanted flood situation and fire in forest because of intense heat. Ice glacier has started melting resulting sudden change in temperature and water level. Now these problems is getting get rectified by global leaders. For instance, The United Nation the head of the global crisis management has allocated the budget on global level to deal with this serious issue and they have come up with critical guidelines to be followed to refrain the danger. In this way every nation has shown the unity to solve this issue on earliest. If this decision would have not been taken by the leaders, this would have been resulted in more destruction.
Most importantly, it has been seen that there are certain concerns that really do not need the involvement of leaders on single platform from different countries. Complications like soil erosion and air pollution can be dealt with in the country. For example, a recent survey done by Times of India shares that Delhi, the capital of India was facing the pollution complications with air quality becoming worst to even breathe, but the local authorities came up with idea of Odd and even number vehicles should run on alternate days to improve the quality of air. In this way trouble was resolved.
In my opinion if the issue is impacting the entire globe, meddling of leaders of distinct country is beneficial but the concerns that only one state or country is going through can be taken care within the country.
To recapitulate, I would say global leaders should unite to resolve the issues that can create the situation of flood, fire in different part of the globe, at the same time local authorities should not bring issues like pollution into the picture to deal on international platforms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'catered'?
Suggestion: catered
..., however, significant issues should be cater globally. This essay will shed light on...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, for example, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02099737533 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60560793089 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2266321118 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172144541342 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545071486702 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501106441177 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940274221986 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515145025903 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.