Some people think that the government should be responsible for solving the traffic and pollution problem. Do the benefits outweigh the drawback?
Nowadays, the menace of traffic and pollution is one rise across the world and has led to a movement by the people against the government to take effective steps to counter the problem before it reaches the point of no return. The essay will deal with whether the benefits outweigh the drawback.
On the one hand, there are numerous problems that the modern civilized society faces. Even though there is a number of issues that are to be addressed. However, lately, the issue of pollution and traffic has been addressed as a greater problem. The people feel that these issues need to be addressed as with these problems come multiple problems which affect the society at large and in order to protect the needs of the citizens the government should take effective steps to safeguard the public at large. For instance, it is the duty of the government to protect the welfare of the people and it is a fundamental right of people to have a better life. Thus, the government should focus on reducing the menace to form a better society.
On the contrary, the drawback of the problem, some feel that the sole effort by the government will not be sufficient to deal with the problems as the joint efforts of the citizens of the state is required. There is a need for proper participation of people to reduce the traffic and pollution. More and more societies with the stringent implementation of law are not able to deal with these problems as well. To cite an example, the city of Los Angeles was not able to deal with the pollution levels and traffic had asked the car manufacturers to retrofit the cars with a new system to reduce emission. Therefore, the people need to serve their part to protect the environment.
In conclusion, the benefits outweigh the drawbacks as it is the duty of the government to have strict measures to enable people to lead a better life. The said objectives can be achieved by the enforceability of law in effective manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat the modern civilized society faces. Even though there is a number of issues that are to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70058139535 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65044710607 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447674418605 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1122281752 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34685252909 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110725270505 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578524889031 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210932678503 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252746561751 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.