It is harsh reality that the issues like traffic and pollution are unsolved and for their reduction distinctive schemes are use. However, some people believes that it is accountability of government to resolve this problem. Withstanding, I think there are multifarious benefits and only some drawbacks, which will be scrutinised in upcoming sections.
To commence with, lawmakers have powers to make hard and fast rules and enforce laws properly. This in return, can reduce the level of pollution and traffic, as people will be afraid of breaking any law due to heavy penalty. To illustrate, many countries in world are taking strict actions, which are changing the condition. Moreover, authorities can launch some initiatives like runing road safety campaigns, environmental summits and conferences at international level to solve this complication. They can make people aware, decreasing pressure on roads and natue, by showing them repercussion of their negligence towards these issues. Hence, goverment can sovle this problem more effectively.
Furthermore, state can invest immense captial, which an individual cannot. They can promote public transport which will not only lessen the traffic but also pollution level. This can ultimately be the successful step, as government can give people specials offers like discount on train and bus tickets. However, on the other side, without cooperation of denizens goverment cannot do anything. As, if people will not follow rules, all that will be waste of time only. For instance, people do not follow traffic rules untill there is any cop present so people are not responsible towards their natural surroundings. Thus, only with peoples support these issues can be solved
In conclusion, merits outway demerits as government have numerous powers with which it is possible to lower the pollution and traffic congestion. While people should also be responsible and do their best.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oples support these issues can be solved In conclusion, merits outway demerits as...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48829431438 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84594751049 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2894502335 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5294117647 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333373102398 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998208231331 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787364190679 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224011698588 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714524653867 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.