In this contemporay epoch, every sector of life have been revolutionised, where transportation has reached at advanced level. However, this rapid development has led elevation in number of private vehicles especially cars, becoming the root cause of traffic jams all over the globe. Withstanding, I completely agree with this assertion and shall scrutinise it with solutions to the issue.
Admittedly, the trend of buying cars has resulted in choking the transport in numerous cities. To commence with, in materialistic world people are only concerned about themselves, so, for their own comfort they tend to use cars instead of public transport. To illustrate, in India during peak hours, in major metropolitan cities traffic is blocked, mainly due to unstopable growth of cars on road. Hence, ownership of cars has made this problem worst in few decades.
However, this complication can be solved by dicouraging people from the use of cars. Firstly, authorities can make hard and fast rules like restricting individuals to buy more than one car. They can make people aware by organising educational camps, campaigns and though media. As, masses are not aware about hazardous repercussion of this phenomenon. Furthermore, making public transport better and cheaper can divert people's attention from using cars. For instance, in India lawmakers are developing public transport and it seems to be working to tackle this issue. Deducing, little effort by government can put full stop to this problem.
In conclusion, traffic jams are common sight all the world, which has several dire consequences. Thus, it should be solved by government as soon as possible.
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?. 78
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 61
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think this a positive or negative development? 84
- Scientist have been warning for many years that to protect our environment we have to limit use of energy in our daily lives despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons and how people can encourage to save environment 83
- Nuclear energy is a better source of power for today global energy needs To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...onal camps, campaigns and though media. As, masses are not aware about hazardous ...
^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l camps, campaigns and though media. As, masses are not aware about hazardous rep...
^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment can put full stop to this problem. In conclusion, traffic jams are common s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38697318008 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93391539483 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662835249042 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3193622032 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.875 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23763719745 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712576650569 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393789346659 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128051447052 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480218983321 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.