Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Majority of people around the world agree that instead of investing money on arts, the government should use it for better causes. In my opinion, I completely agree that the government should not waste funds on arts, instead use them for individual growth and betterment of the society.
Firstly, it is often believed that the amount of money government spends on arts is extortionate. However, these funds can be efficiently used if they are invested in the development of an Individual. For example, in several developing countries like India, were people struggle hard to earn the basic amenities of life like food, shelter and education, it is not a wise decision to invest money in preserving artifacts. Moreover, this amount can be used in providing them proper food, housing and better education opportunities. This in turn will result in improving their standard of living and this certainly is a better way to invest money.
Secondly, instead of investing money in building art museums and high-rise statues, if the government uses this money in improving the infrastructure of the country, several major issues of the country can be tackled. For instance, the major cause of road accidents in most of the countries is poor road conditions. If the government allocates funds for building and maintenance of roads, these mishaps can be avoided. This not only will increase the safety of people on road but also help in upliftment of the society.
In conclusion, money which the government wastes on arts can be used in a better way by allocating them for the development of an individual. These funds can also be efficiently used if they are invested in infrastructural development. This in turn will benefit both an individual and the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...everal developing countries like India, were people struggle hard to earn the basic ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08275862069 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92295031185 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468965517241 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1167282817 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213327696452 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874937600177 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542299401403 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151510744055 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104263522971 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.