In many countries, the rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming poorer.
Why is this a problem?
What solutions are there to tackle this problem?
Since ages, financial inequality has been prevailing in several countries. The privileged section of the society is becoming more and more affluent and are enjoying all the benefits. On the contrary, the poorer section is deprived of even the basic needs of life and are becoming penniless day by day. In my below essay, I will explain the problematic aspect of this scenario and how this can be resolved.
Financial discrimination is a mushrooming issue faced by several developing and underdeveloped countries. This inequality in distribution of finance, has a significant impact on the lower section of the society, as they are deprived of the basic amenities of life. For example, in India around 58% of people are below poverty line. These people rarely have enough funds to afford good health and education. Consequently, the upcoming generations are also destined to live a life of destitution. On the flip side, the people from well-to-do families earn and save multifold to live a prosperous life, which continues through generations.
In order to eradicate this problem, the government should take some important measures, one of which is equality in standards of education for rich and poor. A well-educated individual from a poor family, immensely contributes to the financial upbringing of his family members. Also, individuals for whom seeking education is difficult, for example, senior citizens or physically challenged citizens, the government should allocate special funds. This will help in uplifting their lifestyles and ultimately, they would be able to enjoy a better life. If the government remains ignorant about this critical issue, it will continue to creep into the society, and eventually the aforementioned problems will persist.
In conclusion, financial inequality has deprived the poor from their basic needs of life like good health and education. This can be resolved by the government, if they reserve a certain amount of funds for the lower section and if they debar the discrimination in standards of education between the two sections.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37614678899 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0463627817 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547400611621 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.734701036 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.411764706 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184832247833 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052203831847 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501937672066 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105621554666 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587353150046 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.