Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view.

Essay topics:

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view.

Art is increasingly treated as backward skill in front of other requirements. A handful of people believes that government should better utilize money in other areas which are critical, rather than spending it in promoting art. In my opinion, while there is no denying that other areas are important, art equally plays a vital role in creating a generation with a creative mindset and also depicting country's culture.

Life essential things such as utilities, healthcare that is still not reached out in the poor part of society should be first looked into before spending money on art. Unless life's critical items are not available to everyone, it really does not make sense to allocate some percentage of government funding to encourage art and its related aspects. Government being a central body, the people expect from it to furnish common services at its best instead of providing financial help in other sectors. Overall, spending money on art would be otherwise wasted if basic needs are not provided to all layers of society by government bodies.

Even though strong arguments are provided on why the government should not spend money on art, I believe that art helps to bring out creativity to a great extent. Money spends on art-related initiatives encourage artistic minds to come up with more creative ideas and thoughts. Without the development of creative and imaginative thinking, one will struggle to grow dynamic and individual thinker when it reaches adulthood. Add to it, next-generation learns from art pieces about the rich culture and history of any country. It means financial help to promote art will not be waste as art helps to build personality and to learn more about the unique culture and history.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion validates my perspective that while there is no denying that the government needs to focus more on providing basic necessities to a larger crowd, it will be foolish not to consider valuable things art brings in our lives and in society as a whole.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...rnment needs to focus more on providing basic necessities to a larger crowd, it will be foolish n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, really, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06886227545 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74060055296 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6810656605 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.230769231 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225790585158 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855579023295 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531580300537 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13304189933 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476206347485 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.