Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view.

Nowadays, government is more focused on retaining the art of the country and therefore spending more money in protecting and enhancing the heritage of the country. However, few people are of the concern that spending money on art is not an investment instead is a wastage and government should rather spend on other development activities in the economy. I agree to a certain extent that it is important to spend time and money to save the art of any country and the essay will discuss this in details.

It is an irrefutable fact that government of any country is always focused in retaining the art of the country to help citizens and young generation know more about the history of their country. Our ancestors devoted plenty of time and money in constructing certain monuments which are backed by some or other story and it is important for the new generation to understand the history behind it so that the legacy continues. Furthermore, any economy will thrive in the presence of art rich culture and monuments by attracting more tourists in the country. For example, country like India is rich in heritage and art as reflected in their diverse culture is attracting tourism in different states which therefore helps in the providing more opportunities to the citizens for development.

Contradicting to this, few people are of the opinion that government is wasting the money in art and instead should be focusing more on the concern areas like medical treatments, education facilities, and job opportunities. People should understand that the government has fixed budget allocated to all areas and work in the ambit of same without overspending in any particular department. By developing the art and history would help in generating income in the country which will further add to the surplus of the government so that this money can be utilized.

Government should take steps in converting the art and monuments to tourist attractions which will help in generating revenue and thus the funds can be utilized in activities like building educational institutes, medical facilities which in turn will help in the development of the economy. To conclude, people should understand the importance of an art rich heritage so that they should be able to pass the knowledge about the history to the coming generation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucational institutes, medical facilities which in turn will help in the developme...
^^
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the history to the coming generation.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0703125 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89876271012 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419270833333 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7258703832 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.25 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221340490918 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987894194959 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709761946819 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155729062363 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843238356654 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.