Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe it is a waste of money.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
To art and the artist is an integral part of society. The artist describes the culture, rituals, and tradition of the communities and nations. So, it is the responsibility of the people and governments to assist them fiscally. However, it is a debatable issue that artists should be funded by the government or not. Let us discuss, both the given views followed by my own perspective.
First and foremost, an artist invests a lot of time to invent his creation such as paintings, poems or songs. Meanwhile, they do not have much time to work and earn their bread and butter especially, if someone is in the starting phase of his career. Nonetheless, they have to spend to be a part of any exhibitions or museums until they are not acquainted for their creation. Thus, the initial period artists live below the poverty line and it is hard to survive sometimes. To illustrate, Tushar khan came in the limelight very first time when he was 57 for his painting, later on, he was honored by the Indian government. Now, he is illustrious and he has good earning by selling his painting but before that, he struggled a lot due to economic conditions.
Alternatively, the field of art is totally commercialized these days. These are many private organizations that sponsor the artists for their work. For instance, an artist with a good voice can get an opportunity to perform for promotional commercials. Also, these days a lot of television talent shows can be beneficial for any artist where he could demonstrate his capabilities. Further, he will get good income sources because of the reorganization at television shows.
To conclude, I believe the government should provide some benefits to the artist until they do not have any financial sources or free art galleries can be a good option where an artist can present their skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87539936102 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92870016411 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571884984026 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9739457505 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7647058824 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121788868719 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428501364743 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474116047817 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967384234808 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717632386378 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.