The contentious argument whether subsidies should be provided to farmers for farming or companies should be heavily taxed if companies were fount to be involved in an unethical activity. In the forthcoming paragraph, I will discuss both views and will give my own opinion.
To embark on, farming is a time consuming process and farmer have to incur many expenses before crop is ready to eat or for further processing. So, farmer needs money in the meantime. For instance, Sugarcane needs 1 year of time to be fully ready for manufacturing of sugar. Moreover, Farming cannot be done without having advanced technologies and farmers are not capable to afford these high-tech machines to cultivate their crops. So, Government have to give subsidised farming machines so that farmers can produce crops and vegetables efficiently. To exemplify, farmers dependent on traditional technologies, cannot meet the market requirement on time, therefore compel to sell crops at a lower price.
On the other hand, Companies are involved in unlawful activities to meet the market requirements and face competition. For instance, Maggi was involved in mixing some ingredient which is unhealthy for children as well as for adults. To stop these type of activities, government should inhibit in the processes of such manufacturing companies by implementing high tax and fine on the organisations which are found to be involved in these type of activities.
To sum up, I opine that government should provide monetary help to farmers so that they will do farming with their own consent and also place an eagle eye on the activities of industries to prevent any disturbance in the health of public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a company' or simply 'companies'?
Suggestion: a company; companies
...or companies should be heavily taxed if a companies are involved in an unethical activity. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...o cultivate their crops. So, Government have to give subsidised farming machines so ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21481481481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98938221639 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581481481481 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4844524204 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21556695264 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725444032902 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606983247809 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136527139531 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517967124598 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.