In today’s world, there has been a great demand of workforce which is irrespective of the age. The numbers are growing rapidly and it has sparked a debate about age at which people should be freed from the web of work. The essay will deal with the benefits of superannuating certain classes of workers.
On the one side, with the emergence of numerous job opportunities for different class of people the competition has spiked up. This has led to increased stressful hours of work and posing a risk for the health and safety of the worker as well as the person benefiting from the said tasks. The need has arisen to consider the options of retiring certain classes of workers before a specific time frame. The move would cost the public exchequer a lot of money with superannuates receiving a sum for a longer period of time with less work. For instance, the soldiers who are day and night devoting their life for safety of people within the borders deserve to be retired early. There are certain classes of profession which require a higher level of fitness which beyond a certain age is bound to diminish such as a pilot or a naval pilot who require precise level of mind for calculation and eye sight. As such where the hands of people are at stake should be dealt with in a cautious manner.
On the other hand, the move might come as a benefit to the group of people who willingly want to exploit the policies. They would only work for sometime when nearing to the specific age in order to receive monetary benefits.
In conclusion, in my opinion, I feel that the senior citizens should be allowed to lead a dignified life after having served their country for a longer span of time. The government should on the other side award financial aid to old age people on the basis of education level, medical requirements and status in society in order to make sure that only the ones in need receive benefit and is not exploited by even an affluent old age citizen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...erannuates receiving a sum for a longer period of time with less work. For instance, the soldi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...h less work. For instance, the soldiers who are day and night devoting their life for s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...ecise level of mind for calculation and eye sight. As such where the hands of people are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of mind for calculation and eye sight. As such where the hands of people are at s...
^^
Line 3, column 970, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cautious manner" with adverb for "cautious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eople are at stake should be dealt with in a cautious manner. On the other hand, the move might ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59039548023 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48689790232 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6426595531 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234607441227 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076622501478 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400366617659 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135754751435 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03002039664 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.