Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g. 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age.
In today’s competitive world, where companies and businesses are enforcing strict working policies, lacking human consideration, such as seniority, medical health etc. and focus merely on achieving business vision and mission. However, certain section of society have contrasting views and believe in flexible policies, in favor of senior citizens, especially for those professions involving extreme hard work. In my opinion, such an approach is definitely a great option for easing sufferings of elderly people.
Firstly, professions involving extreme physical activities such as, construction workers, production factory labors etc. demands a lot of energy, for which elderly citizen should be avoiding. Therefore, public authorities must respect their age and must allow them an optional early retirement, provided a worker has already dedicatedly worked for a minimum years (say 10 years). Secondly, military men who have proudly server their nation under life threatening circumstances must be honored with an option of early pension. For instance, India has already implemented such a policy, allowing a military professional to take self retirement after a minimum of 15 years of service. Thirdly, certain crucial professions, for example: a pilot, train drivers, naval officers requires people who are mentally as well as physically fit. More importantly, such works require good eyesight which might be a matter of concern for elderly workers. Furthermore, such duties are highly responsible, as lives of people onboard will be in their hands.
On the other hand, enforcing such policies might lead to loop hole in the HR policies allowing citizenry to exploit the schemes negatively, For instance, a person who have not worked towards national development till 55 years of age and just to receive pension, can work only for 5 years. Therefore, to apply such policies, a detailed analysis of various use-cases must be done to ensure that it leads to economic progress.
To conclude, senior citizens are pillars of any society and must be respected. Therefore, forcing them to work beyond their capabilities is morally incorrect and governments must come up with lenient working policies in favor of elderly citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'year'?
Suggestion: year
...lready dedicatedly worked for a minimum years say 10 years. Secondly, military men wh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56304985337 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90967913361 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633431085044 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8108964988 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149331447046 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439651102987 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442134009616 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803074472133 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530827421619 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.