People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s technologically advanced world, it is undeniable fact that science and technology has have revolutionized the living standards of society. Some section of the society believes that life in current times is way better than what it was century ago. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my opinion, humanity has evolved from Dark Age to current times for ever betterment. However, such dynamic changes has brought along certain challenges needing solutions.
Firstly, one of the fundamental problems of historic times was presence of numerous epidemic diseases such as malaria, polio, cholera etc. which were untreatable during those periods. Thanks to advancements of medical sciences for eradicating such devastating diseases. Secondly, technological innovations in engineering fields made human life much easier and enjoyable. For instance, with the invention of world class means of transport such as aero plane, cars etc. made it possible for people to commute easily. Thirdly, with the advent of internet along with groundbreaking inventions in telecommunication industry, world has connected as a single global village. Furthermore, plethora of information over web is accessible on click of a button. In contrast, a century ago humanity faced numerous challenges to communicate and share information with fellow human being.
On the other hand, as a result of such rapid development of human race, numerous haunting challenges such as population explosion, environmental pollution, global warming etc. have been created. More importantly, such challenges has enormous potential of producing devastating results in longer run and require immediate resolutions.
To conclude, as the saying goes “Change is always for better”. Thus, humanity has always strived hard to improvise living and has successfully achieved better ways of life. Therefore, living in current times is way better than that of ancient times having ingrained with numerous difficulties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...le fact that science and technology has have revolutionized the living standards of ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ay better than what it was century ago. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82252559727 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17137395859 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8784478668 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.65 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131197226748 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409124570523 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543283227723 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893701607394 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642513645551 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.88 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.