Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Many nations across the globe have been investing huge amounts of money on decorative art projects. Although, it is good to improve a nation’s cultural identity by up-lifting the artistic values of a society. However, other important necessities such as housing, food, and medical services should be our higher priority than artistic projects. In my opinion, investments in arts might be good for some wealthy nations, but other lesser developed nations have other critical problems to deal with.
The global economic crisis, firstly, has impacted almost all the nations across the globe, as a result, numerous poor African and Asian countries are going through one of the worst economic times. Therefore, under such circumstances where people do not even have access to food, clean drinking water, and sanitation, it is hard for me to believe that the governments can even think of the artistic appearance of the nation. Money spent on the art projects, secondly, is paid by the government from the taxpayer’s money, which, obviously, is not justifiable. Why would the lower class citizens support their hard-earned money spent on valueless arts projects, when they have other pressing problems to be addressed by the public authorities.
On the other hand, certain people are of an opinion that art is important in a society and they feel that the money spent on it is justified. Indeed art is important, and there will always be artists in society. The debate is, should the money be spent on art when we have substandard education and medical facilities? Of course not. More importantly, wealthier countries, such as, the USA, the UK and China must help lesser developed ones by paying financial aids, instead of lavishly spending on luxurious arts. This will lead to improving living standards of a plethora of poor people.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that all lesser developed nations must stop artistic projects and redirect the funds for the betterment of their citizens. Developed nations, moreover, should understand their social responsibility and reduce spending on art and help lesser developed nations instead.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...hat the money spent on it is justified. Indeed art is important, and there will always...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...UK and China must help lesser developed ones by paying financial aids, instead of la...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, of course, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27246376812 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79411870701 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7709800467 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6875 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260589294096 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084738107505 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676518190356 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15291715475 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452714762307 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.