Some people say that money can make life easier and more comfortable.But others say that having a great amount of wealth can bring some problems.
What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of having a lot of money?
It is true that in today’s modernized world, money has had an enormous influence on the society, and has a great potential for making life smooth and convenient. Although this notion of financial stability is universally acknowledged, it is also agreed by many that, it does bring certain personal problems related to health, relationship, and profession. Therefore, wealthy people need to strike a right balance between finances and personal life in order to live a healthy and prosperous life.
There are a plethora of benefits of living an affluent life. Money, firstly, symbolizes status in the society, as it makes it possible for the people to afford luxurious things such as branded cars, villas and much more. Without it, it is impossible for us to taste the luxuries of life. Abundant money, secondly, secures oneself by guaranteeing life, health, and educational insurances. Educational expenses in reputed universities, for instance, are extremely high and cannot be afforded without having an ample amount of money. Financial stability, more importantly, makes it possible for an individual to enjoy life to its fullest, without having to face the threat of getting fired from the job.
Although above advantages of money are true reflections of today’s materialized world, it is also agreed by many that, having a life abound with luxuries does bring few personal challenges, needing to be dealt with. Personal relationships are the first and foremost victims of having too much of wealth, as it takes a lot of time and energy to earn wealth, compensating the personal relationship. History is replete with examples of wealthy personalities, failing to balance their personal and professional lives, and this has been a common trite among wealthy. What is more, money persuades people to commit unethical and immoral activities, as more often than not, they mistakenly equate money to power, and their mindsets make them carry out illegal acts, which they think is fine, as long as, they can manage it through their finances. Corruption and illegal scandals, for instance, are commonly reported among the business tycoons and financially wealthy people.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that, from the time immemorial, money has been instrumental in living a comfortable and relaxing life, only if it is managed efficiently. Failing to do so, will have devastating results both on personal as well as on professional grounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | Ankita7443 | 64 | view |
- Students in school and university learn far more by lessons with their teachers compared to other sources (example: television and internet). Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 84
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician. 67
- Some people want government to spend money on life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth already has so many problems. Discuss both views and give you own 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ve devastating results both on personal as well as on professional grounds.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30867346939 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94238613054 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558673469388 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9394553527 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0625 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246077401792 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732468183605 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439211481382 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142781861792 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307065356356 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.