Some people think hosting an international sporting event is beneficial for a country while others disagree advantages disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some people think hosting an international sporting event is beneficial for a country while others disagree (advantages, disadvantages)

There are those who assume that conducting international competitions is lucrative for a hosting country. However, their opponents argue that it is not the case. In this essay, I will consider both sides of the argument and then I will give my own opinion on the matter.

From one side, there are a number of pros for the nation which holds a significant sporting event with participants from foreign countries. First, hosting this kind of event boosts the local economy, in terms of growing tourism in particular. Thus, numerous people become aware about the country and its attractions. As a result, a significant number of finances will flow to the national budget. Second, construction of new infrastructure, stadiums and hotels in preparation for the event will create thousands of working places for locals.

Nevertheless, above mentioned construction will lay a financial burden on the local budget and definitely affect local citizens as finances are not limitless and probably some socially significant projects will not be funded as a result. In addition, practice has shown that gigantic buildings of constructed sport complexes as rule had no further usage except of the international sporting event. Consequently, they will either fall into despair or consume a considerable part of the budget for maintenance.

In conclusion, having considered both sides of the argument I assume both sides have their merits. On balance, however, I believe that the subject of hosting a significant international sporting event should be thoroughly examined and planned for each country in particular. Whether will it be justified or not?

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37065637066 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0524941225 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2585153715 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197111168419 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651702199982 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651619579899 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118581396015 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339958614057 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.