Some People Think That For Individuals, Planning For The Future Is A Waste Of Time. It Is More Important For Individuals To Focus On The Present. Do You Agree Or Disagree?
In the present age, whether planning for the future is a waste of time or it is important for individuals to live in present has sparked much of a debate. Some people contend that planning for future is essential for the coming years, while others think living in present leads life to a better lifestyle. Personally, I am in the favor of the former view.
In today's modest world, everything comes at a cost. To begin with, some individuals prefer to spend and have a luxury lifestyle, they do not believe in traditional way of living and planning life. Similarly, people who thinks planning for future is not important live life conveniently and comfortably. For instance, many individuals like to travel and explore the world ,so they spend their money into travelling and visiting different places. This is because in today's generation individuals have new way of thinking and spending their life.
In contrast, planning for future is as paramount as living in the present age. Future planning is essential because individuals can plan their life after retirement. Saving money for future should be mandatory part of life as no one knows when life can turnaround. For example, individuals might need monetary requirement at the time of medical emergencies or to plan their future need. Therefore, planning for future is very critical especially in today's generation.
In summary, I would like to concede that planning for future supports the argument in a much better way. Overall, I am convinced that future planning is very important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...als like to travel and explore the world ,so they spend their money into travellin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07450980392 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78145669491 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513725490196 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6072743448 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447707081112 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171311083684 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127067788242 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302577542307 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116593497106 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.