Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided on whether climate change should be prevented, or whether methods should be discovered to cope with it. I believe that the former should be the case, and the focus should be on finding out the ways to avert this pattern rather than to live with it.
Although it is a widely held belief that new techniques should be invented to get along with the changing climate, in practice, doing so, would be a short-term solution. This is due to the fact that most of these techniques, which enable the human race to live with the changing environment, have future repercussions. The evidence for this can be seen in the use of modern electronic devices, such as air conditioners and central heating units, to control the indoor temperature during extreme weather conditions. Though the use of these devices provides relief in the current scenario, the harmful gases released by these would contribute more to the environmental damage in the near future.
Having said that, instead of looking for solutions to survive with changing atmospheric patterns, strategies to stop the harmful environmental effects should be taken under consideration. The reason for this is that if appropriate steps are not taken on time to control the atmosphere situation now, then it would have unprecedented devastating effects. This also means that the ignorance of climate change is a threat to biodiversity on planet earth. For these reasons, the ultimate goal should be to develop technologies that are environmentally friendly rather than those which provide benefits, which are short-lived and have adverse future implications.
In conclusion, I disagree with this proposition that new methods should be explored to live with climate change. On the contrary, the objective should be to find out the ways to avoid environmental change.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24662162162 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93597797552 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7524564561 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14648236328 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659379310553 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496826582751 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107927249345 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038470527789 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.