Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways do to this.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
It is argued that in order to cut down the amount of pollution in the environment, an international car-free day should be introduced. However, others believe there are better methods of reducing it. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and give reasons why free transport system and the manufacture of more electric vehicles are more efficient options of decreasing the release of toxic gas into the air.
Declaring a global car-free day is believed to be a great idea in curbing pollution. This is because,in the past, issues, such as lung cancer, affecting human lives are usually resolved by raising awareness. For instance, making people aware of the dangers of smoking has enormously decreased smokers. However, in this case, it would not be effective because the effects is on the environment and not on individuals.
On the other hand, there are several options to bring down the amount of air pollution. First of all, the government should give its citizens access to free public transport. If people are permitted to use public transportation system without paying, they will abandon their fleets and commute in public buses. In addition, manufacturing more electric cars would cut down on air pollution. Hybrid cars, for example, do not emit carbon mono oxide as they do not require fuel gas to operate, therefore, will not pollute the atmosphere.
In conclusion, while some think declaring international days is a great way to stop pollution, others argue that there are more effective ways to bring it down. This essay discussed the several ways to reduce it such as providing free transport to the populace as well as manufacturing more electric automobiles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ea in curbing pollution. This is because,in the past, issues, such as lung cancer,...
^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pollution. This is because,in the past, issues, such as lung cancer, affecting h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20072992701 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8374005381 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2112815909 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388106571271 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112300401048 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883440840644 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227919031202 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105101489064 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.