Some people think it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extend do you agree.
Most of the working population favors the fact that, the decision makers of any company should be compensated in higher limits compared to the lower positions in the company. I strongly agree with the statement because it is very important for any company to pay salary to its employee based on their positon and responsibilities for the continuous growth of the company. This essay will discuss the main reasons why it’s necessary to compensate its top management in higher digits.
The primary reason for offering higher salary to its senior management is to respect the knowledge, qualification and experience of the candidate. Moreover, offering such packages satisfies the candidate and thus he will work hard for the company. Whenever, an organization recruit candidate to fill-in its key positions, the company will be looking at the problem solving, decision making skills of the aspirant, to make it clear that the company is in safer hands, so that, the operations of the company should run smoothly. Compensating such position by good remuneration is essential to respect the time and effort one dedicated to acquire knowledge about every function of the department and position they are joining. For example, Sundhar Pichai, who has joined as the CEO of google is one of the highest paid Senior employee across the organizations where this remuneration is offered based on his capabilities and knowledge about the industry he expertise.
Another important outcome of such action is that it will motivate the lower hierarchy to create an instinct to grow faster in their career. Every student who graduates from university will be focusing on settling down in his life as quick as possible, and to do so they need to earn a good amount of money. Most of the candidate has to settle down for lower salary packages during the initial years of his job because, the organization consider them as fresher with limited knowledge and experience. Thus, he will be always admiring about reaching to senior positions as the compensation and respect offered for such positions are always fascinating, this makes him work hard to reach his benchmarks and indirectly makes the employee to perform well in his assignments.
In conclusion, it is evident that, offering higher salaries to those serves in the upper management positions as it gives satisfaction and value to the person who takes up such responsibility, also nurture competitive mindset in the lower hierarchy to grow faster in their career to earn more salary and respect. Moreover, this trend indirectly pressurizes the employee to perform well, also it contributes towards faster growth of the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e its top management in higher digits. The primary reason for offering higher s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge about the industry he expertise. Another important outcome of such action...
^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will always be
...ited knowledge and experience. Thus, he will be always admiring about reaching to senior posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee to perform well in his assignments. In conclusion, it is evident that, offer...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20092378753 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90098702558 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496535796767 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7916594993 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.857142857 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9285714286 20.7667163134 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157855868947 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573931298808 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333936384199 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101078644078 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238611269283 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.