It is often argued that high rank officials should have big salary than common workers in the same institution. Although having diverse salary wages for every specific role look unfair, I think it is just that higher employees must have greater income.
Firstly, it is common in every institution that company ranks is one of the salary basis. But, despite of the luxury cars and high end gadgets senior level people have, they bare great task and responsibility. For example, in Jollibee Food Corporation, a general manager was not just assigned to manage a problem of a single store. But, he carries the responsibility of thousands of stores around the world, providing strategic plans and actions to improve the companies service. Thus, high power begets greater responsibility, which deserves greater salary pay.
Moreover, most of these people who are in top brass started from the bottom. People who are the bosses generally started from the ground, they climb they way up by exerting effort and experience before they are promoted to manage a part of the company. For instance, a customer service personnel starts from receiving very basic local calls, then eventually when he gets used to it, he can cater international calls, until he gets to know all the company business even if he's eyes are shut. Experience is one of the primary reason why people get promoted since they already have the mastery of the company services. With this, it is evident that people who possess high rank merits higher pay.
To conclude, company role is one of the basis for a person's salary. People who are in these positions shoulders great responsibility and I believed that they deserved the higher pay since almost all of them starts from the lowest rank.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...o know all the company business even if hes eyes are shut. Experience is one of the...
^^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... company role is one of the basis for a persons salary. People who are in these positio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56274855054 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4790824311 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220504748362 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756559438835 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367323321786 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136443932864 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449133623585 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.