Some people think it is a good thing for a senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organization. To what extent do you agree?
A big organization comprised of many people working hard at various levels. According to their level of work and capability to handle workload, they get paid.
When a person starts a job, he put his 100 percent effort to get appreciation from client/senior managers etc. The sole reason to provide one’s best effort is to get a better position as compared to the current one and also salary hike. Salary hike or an upgrade position will not only boost employee’s moral but also encourage them to work with more passion and dedication.
As the learning graph should always be increasing likewise , constant appraisal should be given to an executive. If a person is giving his time and effort to any esteemed organization, then that person deserve prize. With the advancement of everything, in any company this is reflected via giving payraise or better position.
Observe any senior member of any organization, the way they handle work, the management of team, workload distribution everything will be different from any guy who is one position downer than that senior member. Capability of a person speaks for itself. A person coming office before hours, going after office hours, handling client orientation/requests, taking bandwidth from daily work and give extra in other things will always comes in notice. And to give extra benefits for all his hardwork is fair and square.
I strongly agree that senior management people have high salaries as compared to other workers because at some point or other they proved their level and to give anybody what they deserve is not role. There is constant competition in every nook and cranny of this world, to motivate a person, to make them realize that their work I valuable for company they should get extra benefits. Healthy competition in any team will always be proved beneficial for every person. Two person in same team, but both are totally opposite, one guy is handling daily work pressure, meeting as well as other process flow and the other one is lethargic and doing on daily basis tasks but are on same level getting same salary,it would be highly illogical and discouraging for the first guy. Hikes are just to encourage people to put more efforts and let no stone unturned for their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aph should always be increasing likewise , constant appraisal should be given to a...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to prize'
Suggestion: to prize
... organization, then that person deserve prize. With the advancement of everything, in...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
... give extra in other things will always comes in notice. And to give extra benefits f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s handling daily work pressure, meeting as well as other process flow and the other one is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ut are on same level getting same salary,it would be highly illogical and discourag...
^^^
Line 5, column 786, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raging for the first guy. Hikes are just to encourage people to put more efforts ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98153034301 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71471827099 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54617414248 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.612445907 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.058823529 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2941176471 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222762898308 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635237139441 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722564177739 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102397506442 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846517511935 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.