People do not have the option to choose their families, however, they can always choose their friends. Some people prefer to choose friends who think in the same direction as them whereas other people want friends who have different opinions and sometimes disagree with them. This essay will explore both the ideas in the below paragraphs to aid readers come to their own conclusion.
Undeniably, friends hold the nexus of our lives and choosing apt friends lies in our hand. Friends who have the same likes and dislikes usually have longstanding friendships and they come to a conclusion rapidly. Planning a trip, for instance, become viable when all the friends think in a similar fashion. Another positive feature that warrants favoring friends with similar opinion is that you tend to quarrel less. When there is no different opinions, means no debate which consequently leads to no fight. Mostly friends fight when it comes to deciding a place or food, which will not happen if they have matching interests.
With the above salient features of having friends with alike opinion, advantages of friends with contrasting viewpoint now merit some useful discussion. Friends with unlike thinking is a blessing when it comes to adventure. For example, if one person is a traveler and the other is not, the later will also end up exploring new places. Not only this friendship will thrill you but also it will make you look at the world through two different eyes. For instance, the pet lover friend will always convince the usefulness of pets to other non lover pet friend.
Friends should be chosen wisely. If someone is capable of making many friends, then one can choose a mix of variety, otherwise it is significant to choose one friend that is exactly similar to you for the whole life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ecome viable when all the friends think in a similar fashion. Another positive feature that warrants...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94059405941 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45422092319 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3243895913 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410573046619 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130662389524 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152881072928 0.0667982634062 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251088634261 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150772383265 0.056905535591 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.