Companionship has always been highly regarded and as humans, we tend to choose our friends with various reasons in mind. This essay will discuss why some people enjoy the company of like-mindedness while others appreciate a little contradiction.
On the one hand, it is quite less complicated to have friends who understand our thought process and relate to it quickly. This is often the case when we have to plan for a vacation. During the planning process, a group that consists of members having similar opinion tend to construct a robust plan and even proceed to execute it effortlessly. Humans usually are very calm and composed beings and always wish to be in that state, hence when actions are carried out smoothly without any conflicts our biological tendency is to pursue it with serenity, thus opting to have like-minded company.
On the other hand, having friends who may contradict our thoughts usually exposes us to a different perspective, widening our computational power. Humans are among the few species that are able to train themselves and bring out a better version that is more tangible. In such situations, people who possess a little competitive edge usually tend to be surrounded by companies who may contradict a few opinions. In research published by Howard University, the statistics suggest that mixing a group of candidates with different opinions for a task resulted in greater brain activity which consequently produced a remarkable result.
In conclusion, a few people may opt to have companions whose thoughts are in-line with theirs due to simplicity while others may choose differently for self-development reasons. I personally believe a healthy mixture of both variations needs to maintain in life as one brings calmness while the other brings competitiveness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...ceed to execute it effortlessly. Humans usually are very calm and composed beings and alway...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ently produced a remarkable result. In conclusion, a few people may opt to hav...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25951557093 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03162373127 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1106115671 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262507909141 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876740852231 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378804020171 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151729180868 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146248120425 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.