A friend in need is a friend indeed. This statement is a complete posit, but mostly it depends which type of friend we have. Friends could be good, bad, having same or different opinions, also could have thought variation. Firstly, whenever we make any friend, it is not an instant process, it takes time. Friendship is like a thread and it should be deemed or valuable, which majorly depends on trust.
Whenever, we make any friend, at some point we like or dislike many things about that person. Sometimes, we like some person on the basis of having same opinions, someone who agrees with our thoughts. There are possibilities too that very rarely we get attracted to person's, who disagrees with our thoughts and opinions.
There is a popular proverb: Opposite attracts, same repulse. This statement is alike of human behavior, as world is full of different types of human beings. Some people like opposite one's and some likes those who have same opinions.
A good or bad friend selection, always takes much more care and concern. According to my opine, we easily like that friends who have same types of qualities, same vibes, same perception as we have. Those who disagree with us, does not mean that they are not capable of any friendship. Might be they could have far better knowledge, experience and they could be straight forward. So it does not mean that those who sometimes disagree with our statements, can not be our friends. In some circumstances, we could not be amoral due to the ambivalent conditions and in such conditions a true friend or any person who gives us right direction or path, is a good friend indeed.
In last, according to my conception/notion having same or different opinions, depends on the circumstances and situations that a person is facing. Because it is not possible even that all the time, a person could have same opinions and also could disagree.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86153846154 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66833281283 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498461538462 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0518969754 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1578947368 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1052631579 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73684210526 7.06120827912 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298584286663 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100221880378 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599369450596 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167093522222 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491204409894 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.