Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others, however, believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work.
These days, many people show their concerns whether natural aptitude should determine the kind of work men and women do, or they are both capable of doing the same type of activities. The question is, what should we do about it? This essay will explain both aspects. However, I am of the opinion that both genders are qualified to take the same challenge and are capable of doing similar jobs.
From the natural ability perspective, women are physically weaker than men and hence they are less suitable for the jobs that require ferocity and physical power. Men are meant to provide and protect their wives and the entire family. Secondly, the caring nature and tender heart that women possess make them more capable for certain careers. This means they generally perform better in occupations that require patience, caring and kind heart such as nursing, social works and teaching.
On the other hand, education and modern society have offered both genders to do any form of work and this was the most natural trend for the modern society to accept. First, women and men who go through the same university and training programmes become equally prepared to take positions in a company or in a society. Again, the traditional idea that women will take care of their children and men will earn the living is changing and a reverse scenario could be seen in many families. Finally, women in almost all fields have already proved that they can perform as good as men if they are given the opportunity.
In conclusion, although being naturally endowed may be beneficial for both genders, it is not particularly needed at workplaces. However, learning and training are indispensable for men and women in any society to work.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92808219178 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43462803727 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578767123288 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5943736728 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394587195595 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121350018909 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078064168006 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234264413603 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268619948458 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.