Some people think men and women have different natural abilities that make them suitable for different types of work. Others, however, believe that both men and women can be equally suited to do any type of work.
Whether men and women have equal capability to do any job or the type of work they do should be based on their natural features and inherent abilities is a widely debated issue. While some believe that both genders have an equal aptitude to do any sort of work, others, however, deny it and profess that nature has created men and women differently so that they become more suitable for particular jobs. This essay delves this issue and then draw a sensible conclusion.
A group of people opine that men and women are not physically that much different. Apart from that, men and women possess the same natural abilities, thinking patterns, needs and instincts. Since women are kept mostly inside houses, they react differently than men in different situations. If both men and women are given the equal opportunity and experience, they can both handle any job with the same efficiency. Thus this group of people deny that men are better in some selective jobs while women could outperform men in some jobs. As an evidence, they say that in the past women were deprived of education, job and other social activities and because of that number of women in higher positions was only a few.
Another group, however, remains strict to the fact that men and women have different physical and mental capacities and these capacities make them more suitable for different types of professions. For instance, a woman is a natural caregiver and hence nursing is a more suitable profession for her. On the contrary construction works, one example of such many professions is suitable for men.
In conclusion, looking at the rest of the living creatures in the world we can observe that tasks for men and women are determined mostly by their natural abilities and this is a natural law. Denying it would not be a good idea and in my opinion, no task is less important and thus distinctive professions makes them perform better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...andle any job with the same efficiency. Thus this group of people deny that men are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h many professions is suitable for men. In conclusion, looking at the rest of th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, then, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85410334347 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56248129027 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6515841225 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.071428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.573413923905 0.244688304435 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181230662604 0.084324248473 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11379158922 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321421232347 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107422316844 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.