Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think that it is awaste of valuable money What is your opinion

Something that is everyone agrees about that over the time many species have gotten extinct. While some people think we should not spend money to save this process, I strongly agree with the view that we should provide some funding to keep guard these endangered species.

Those who do not support funding for species protection believe that species extinction is a natural process, and funding money is a wasteful decision. It is true that studying evaluation history, we found several examples which show that whichever species are not fittest enough may not survive longer. However, in my opinion, the phenomenon of the recent years cannot be compared with previous earlier time; and this is because the rate of extinction is much higher than ever before, and the main reason behind it is the human activities.

I support the funding for species protection is mainly because reach biodiversity is the sign of healthy environment. Moreover, the weak environmental quality eventually affects our health, as we are not separated from entire ecosystem. For example, species extinction impacts the food chain of our ecosystem. To clarify, if there were no tiger population, the deer population would have grown faster. Similarly, drop in tiger population is a sign showing that the deforestation rate is too high. Also, I believe beautiful, and sustainable world is a result of diversified biodiversity. If there were no butterfly and bird in our park, what would attract us to visit and spend time there?

In conclusion, I think not for the sake of endangered species, but for the sake of our survival we should for funding to protect our species and our biodiversity.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the fittest'.
Suggestion: not the fittest
...s which show that whichever species are not fittest enough may not survive longer. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1204379562 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76671463906 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5446388701 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.923076923 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201327685442 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576004411935 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734792922109 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129878283891 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713065558658 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.