Some people prefer full-time jobs because they offer stability. Other people prefer casual jobsbecause of the freedom they offer.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer full-time jobs because they offer stability. Other people prefer casual jobs
because of the freedom they offer.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Something that everyone will agree about that we need to work to earn money and to meet our financial commitments. While some people prefer a casual or part-time job, I believe the full-time job is better than casual.

It is probably true that there are some benefits to the casual job. Most of the casual jobs come with flexible timing, and therefore an employee enjoys the privilege to manage his or her working schedule. For example, one of my friends always works as a part-time employee, so that she can pay more time to her child. If she were working as full-time staff, she would need to hire a maid for her child. A casual job is a good option when one of the family members is working as a full-time employee.

On the other hand, a full-time job provides several advantages. Most the people, who prefer a full-time job is first because it helps for long-term financial planning. Since a full-time job provides a flexible income for a relatively long time, it supports a stable plan, which eventually helps us to meet our critical financial commitments, such as child education, housing loan, and so on. For instance, If I were not working as a full-time employee, I would be ever able to finance my wife’s education and car loan. In addition to this, as most of the full-time positions are permanent, such jobs provide a job security and peace of mind.

In conclusion, although some people prefer to engage in the casual job, as it allows more time to spend with family, people who need to meet several financial commitments full-time job is the best option.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-04 ap11021987 78 view
2018-01-02 somdeep 56 view
2018-01-02 somdeep 56 view
2018-01-02 somdeep 56 view
Essays by user somdeep :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71119133574 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63922374221 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.309455366 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.384615385 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243439708035 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111781046009 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879828529555 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187923852581 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546441916266 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.