Some people think that one of the ways to solve the environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is argued by a significant number of individuals that to find a solution for the environmental problems, one method is to raise the petrol price of a different transport system. In my opinion, I completely agree with the idea because it will control the purchase limit of personal vehicles and avoidable travels will stop to some extent, which will benefit the environment will lower emission of toxins.
To begin with, an increase in the price of petrol or diesel will limit people from purchasing personal vehicles. Low economic budget people will be highly affected by the increase in price and limit such individuals from purchasing these expensive materials. For instance, in India, most of the families belong to the middle class and their budgets are constrained according to their needs, therefore increase in the price of fuel can directly limit them from buying these luxury things. Therefore, Increase in prices will pull the cars from the traffic which directly benefits the environment by lowering the pollution levels.
Similarly, the transportation cost will increase to a new peak level because of the increase in fuel price, thus people will control their travel, and as a result, the environment air will improve. Hike in the fuel price will have a huge impact on air travel as planes flight tickets prices are sensitive to fuel price and aeroplane travelling is the major contributor in polluting air. Hence, people will limit their air travel including business and economy classes. A recent survey from Aviation board has revealed that people often travel less whenever the state increase the fuel price. Hence, the government can solve the environmental problem to some extent by increasing engine fuel price.
To conclude, I totally agree with the notion that raises the price of fuel is the one way to resolve difficulties of environment because this will limit travellers from travel and purchasing personal vehicles. Therefore, less usage of vehicles in daily needs will limit the pollution level in the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21686746988 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70272378377 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8417320833 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.230769231 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253763538703 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11470214108 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753093627833 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159940193415 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402320841111 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.