The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a highly debatable question these days that mobile phones are harmful to society similarly like smoking. A significant number of individuals argue that these electronic gadgets should be restricted to certain places likewise smoking is. While overuse of mobile phones can be dangerous sometimes, I believe that these devices should not be banned because it is the best communication tool in the world.
To begin with, addiction to excess use of mobile phones can introduce trouble in any one’s life. There are a plethora of examples that justify mobile phones should be controlled in certain places. Firstly, while driving, the driver must not use his phone because these gadgets can distract their mind from their job and a survey has revealed that most of the accidents happened around the world because of the use of the telephone during driving. Secondly, in classrooms, students are expected to pay attention to their studies rather than using mobile phones which can distract them from their original path.
However, these handy electronic devices are essential in today’s world to remain connected with the rest of the world. These devices act as a prime way of communication with other individuals and people are getting more and more dependent on it. For instance, mobile phones are the source of communication with family members, relatives and friends even if we are not present in the same location. Similarly, these technical devices with the support of the internet make an individual more social by interacting with people around the world on social applications like Facebook. Therefore, looking at the advantages I believe that phones must not be barred from any location around the world.
In conclusion, although, at certain stages use of these gadgets create difficulty for people and become antisocial, I believe that the benefits of mobile phones cannot be replaced with any other devices, therefore, we must continue using it without restrictions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27672955975 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72412727816 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525157232704 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5272789408 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.076923077 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279845915973 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1147729037 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812991767575 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187355136997 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968226800701 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.