Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position What s your opinion
It is claimed that the employees should be placed in higher positions on the basis of time that they have devoted to the organizations. However, in my opinion, the abilities and outcomes of the workers should be taken into account while making a decision for promoting them.
Admittedly, the skills and the way of working of any particular individual play an indispensable role in determining his place in the company. In other words, a majority of people can combat any issues easily and are able to glitter the name of their workplace. No doubt, working for a long time in any industry broadens the horizons of their knowledge, but it does not assure that an employee having greater experience can always surpass the smart one. Taking the example of my own business, the workers who were assigned the jobs in 2020 are performing any day better than those who were recruited in 2017.
Apparently, results obtained from the workforce are another contributing aspect to be considered. That is to say, certain projects and assignments are given to the individuals, which they need to complete in a definite period of time, thus evaluating their outputs from the assigned piece of work would provide an appropriate judgment about their contribution to the business. A recent study conducted in Japan has revealed that about 54% of Engineering companies follow a process for providing a better place to their workers in the industry, in which they prioritize those people who have completed their targets rather than the time they have devoted to the organization.
On balance, although serving a business for a long turn is being considered as an important factor for placing a person in a better position; even then this essay agrees that capabilities and results obtained from the given work to the employees are more crucial to understand because these aspects help to reach a conclusion more clearly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ich they need to complete in a definite period of time, thus evaluating their outputs from the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, so, then, thus, while, no doubt, in my opinion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02839116719 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79192820813 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574132492114 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.339840677 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223435687147 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848020451892 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542247750354 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138053339287 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651348745526 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.