Many people work long hours, leaving very little time for leisure activities. Does this situation have more advantages or more disadvantages? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, the trend of working for a long duration and not devoting time to entertainment is being followed by a number of people. This essay agrees that this phenomenon has more drawbacks. In my opinion, health issues and social isolation are the two biggest negative effects of this, followed by the flawed argument that spending a sizeable amount of time in office would help them to get a promotion, which is not valid.
Apparently, doing overtime at the workplace would cast an adverse effect on the holistic well-being of an individual. That is to say, a majority of people perform most of their jobs on digital screens these days, which emit harmful rays. Thus, by remaining glued to these devices for a long time, a person may fall prey to some visual and hearing impairments. Moreover, these devices are the main culprit for developing psychometric disorders among people. A recent study conducted by World Health Organization has revealed that about 78% of people are reeling under depression and anxiety due to overuse of technological appliances. Apart from this, leaving very small time for the family would widen the gap among relatives. In other words, masses who use to perform official activities for a long time, hardly get the time to spend with family members and friends. Therefore, their such habits
definitely alienate them from their social circle and broaden the communication gap among multitudes. Taking the example of the famous hometown namely Chandigarh, in the residential areas, people even do not know that who are their neighbors as they usually tend to live at work premises for the whole day.
Admittedly, it is believed by a majority of individuals that doing overtime duties would help them to get a higher position in any organization. However, there are many other aspects that can help an employee to get a promotion, such as the skills and smartness of a person. No doubt, devoting greater time to any task would provide much knowledge and experience, but it does not assure that a person having more experience always surpasses the smarter one. Furthermore, working extra time affects the productivity of the workers because human minds work well only if adequate rest is provided to them. To exemplify, a research carried out in my own company has concluded that employees who do their duties in assigned working hours are more efficient than those who spend extra time.
On balance, although sticking to the professional duties for the long turn is considered to be very beneficial for the sake of shifting to higher positions in the company; however, serious effects provided by this trend, such as health complications and lack of social interactions concluded that its disadvantages outperform the invalid advantage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...g relatives. In other words, masses who use to perform official activities for a lo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 455.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77577806162 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6127871214 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258720895666 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751760107124 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533899678482 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129905787034 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274637332294 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.