Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to higher positions. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples.
There are enormous number of people think that employees who serve for a long period in such company, they should solely get the promotion to higher positions. So i agree with statement. And here, i will discuss in details as following;
First of all, it is necessary to companies to promote people into higher positions within their current employee. Hence, there will be a kind of motivation among employees inside company, so employers will show a value of their workers who work in the company. Individuals who deserve peromotion, in particular, thise who are hard workers, honest, and loyal to the organisation which they are serving in it.
Furthermore, internal promotion to its employees themselves will reinforce them to work harder, as they will show their intergrity to the organisation which they work in it. So comapnies who follow internal promotion policy, they are more successful in in making their staff more productive, compared to other companies which they hire new people with higher positions from outside the company, to illustrate more, there is a study, it came out from employees's rights protection community in France, it showed that companies who follow external promotion by hiring new workers with higher positions. As a result, it affected on existing staff, who serve for a long time in the compnay, as they became less productive. However, neglecting their current employees will encourage them to leave one's comany as soon as possible to search for better companies.
In addition, in case, if their existed staff stay in a company who have external promotion, they will show their passion against their company, as well as they may be disloyal.
In brief, following internal promotion would help in sloving a number of problems, which organisations may encounter it in the future for the characteristics which i have mentioned it earlier. Notably, this technique will help companies from losing their employees, whereas New staff need to be trained as well, even they have a good expereience in such field, while current employees know much better than new hired staff.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t the promotion to higher positions. So i agree with statement. And here, i will ...
^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s. So i agree with statement. And here, i will discuss in details as following; ...
^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... i will discuss in details as following; First of all, it is necessary to compani...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...motion policy, they are more successful in in making their staff more productive, com...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies from losing their employees, whereas New staff need to be trained as well, ev...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in brief, in particular, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1778425656 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76673773516 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518950437318 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.0901540887 49.4020404114 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5833333333 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9166666667 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227120680066 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956464276718 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065264982589 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14499013634 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612223633154 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.