Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centres while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
A few centuries ago, when there were a handful of cars in dusty streets, cars did not cause any problem. However, the number of cars around the world has increased exponentially and many big cities are facing both congestion and pollution problems. Some people think that personal cars are to be blamed and they should be banned from streets. This essay will discuss its feasibilities.
Banning private cars is technically possible. Many cities have been doing this for decades and the result was fantastic. It resolves congestion by cutting away more than half number of cars in the city; altogether with pollution problem because it is mostly caused by the same set of cars. More than that, it has proofed that banning cars drastically reduced the number of accidents happen on road.
On the other hand, car ban needs well managed public transportation such as bus, and train. The city needs to have its infrastructure ready before issuing a ban order. In addition, not every destinations are accessible by public transportation., a badly organized city may not be successful with car ban because people cannot go wherever they want to go. It also needs a lot of parking lot around city perimeter because people need a place to park their cars before on boarding public transportation.
In summary, car ban solves a lot of problems exist in big cities. It is possible given a ready transportation system available before hand otherwise it would not be feasible. I am of the opinion that car ban should be done at some level in big cities to promote healthier and less stressful life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...a ready transportation system available before hand otherwise it would not be feasible. I a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78749165727 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0005962016 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238792320451 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869663426562 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602240298844 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151685836395 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418634069595 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.