Since the growth of the economy cannot widespread to all social classes, some countries have introduced some taxes to manage their inhabitants so that there is no poverty amongst people. Furthermore, some people believe that the primary obligation of residents in a country is paying tax, while others argue that the society in a country can live in well-being when their inhabitants take more roles in other sectors. I believe that the role of inhabitants should not only be limited to paying a tax but also support other social responsibilities.
It is true that taxes play an important role to produce a developed country. The collection of money of taxes will support the government to build public facilities, such as highway and transportation. In addition, these activities also affect the significant roles to develop human resources in developing countries. For instance, in Finlandia, the most income of the country is taken from the taxes. This money is reallocated by the government to diminish poverty and to improve the skill of youngsters by applying free school and scholarship.
On the other hand, helping each other should not be limited to taxes. There are some activities to support social life amongst people. Firstly, individuals who have much money can support the government by opening a start-up company to reduce unemployed people. This condition will take more beneficial due to many people can live from those companies. Secondly, the government needs some people who can be volunteers to boost the improvement of social life in remote areas where this location is not achieved by technology. In Indonesia, volunteers as a doctor or teacher are needed especially in the area around East Indonesia. Many volunteers prefer to sacrifice their life for people in remote areas and they do not hope about a high salary for their career path.
In conclusion, although taxes play an important role in social life, there are other initiatives from the inhabitant that would take more benefit such as open start-up companies and be volunteers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18208955224 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85773777341 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519402985075 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8117489926 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200633422241 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629170074054 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679695066029 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120317533395 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977152215739 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.