In modern life, the history of the world can be accessed at the museum where this place will offer some crucial knowledge since the world start. The information which shows in the museum such as historical goods (artifact, fossil, and myth story) shall be honored or it just invention which we don't pay for it. Moreover, both parties have their reason to the argument whether the registration in the museum must be followed by money or it will prefer to settle that it is free admission.
To begin with, the invention of the rare thing isn't cheap. Not only adherent right which many archeology has spent the time to break-down and analyze the fundamental revelation but also the rare collection of historical items will make the museum shall be priced. For instance, some fossil of dinosaurs has been trapped in the deep soil layer. The excavation of this project needs money to pay for mobilization such as excavator, transporter and human resources. Furthermore, the charge of the museum uses to maintain the facilities and to pay for the employers. This is why the admission of the museum will cover that endeavor.
On the other hand, many museums will offer knowledge just for free. There are some several explanations about the free charge museum. Firstly, It just provides intellectual which isn't need more strive to get the offering objects. For example, in Surabaya, you will know about the Sampoerna Museum which is no cost to visit the museum because of all of the goods is displayed in artificial not original. Secondly, some facilities in the museum, in general, has been supported by government funding.
In conclusion, the more valued information that was collected by the museum will be paid by the money. As long as the registration price is still relevant to the public budget, it will give more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
... shows in the museum such as historical goods artifact, fossil, and myth story shall ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e honored or it just invention which we dont pay for it. Moreover, both parties have...
^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...n with, the invention of the rare thing isnt cheap. Not only adherent right which ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun archeology seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much archeology', 'a good deal of archeology'.
Suggestion: much archeology; a good deal of archeology
...nt cheap. Not only adherent right which many archeology has spent the time to break-down and an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ly, It just provides intellectual which isnt need more strive to get the offering ob...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... no cost to visit the museum because of all of the goods is displayed in artificial not or...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94174757282 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66870032738 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1501344845 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27880739527 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100730370321 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861433781269 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163758564493 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935067842942 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.