Some people think that robots are important for human’s future development. Others think that robots have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is often argued that machines have a positive impact on society advancement, whilst others disagree and claim that their influence leads to adverse ramifications (implications). This essay agrees that new technologies’ contribution is rather beneficial than detrimental.
Household appliances, cutting-edge medical equipment, and state-of-the-art manufacturing machinery - all of them have appeared to ease daily routine, extend lifespan, and advance industrial processes. In other words, men would wash their clothes by hands, patients would pass away from misdiagnosed diseases, as well as households would not drive their personal cars, were it not for the development of science. It is therefore agreed that robots, regardless of where they apply, are crucial. Ultrasound is a prime example of how screening disorders or malfunctioning organs can not only save but also prolong life.
However, many disagree and feel that modern devices halt social progress. This is to say that humans have put themselves at risk having become dependent on computers, which might cease operating, leaving people no chance to survive. Despite this, people’s involvement is still possible, and this essay disagrees that technology evolution should be dismissed for this reason. For instance, during the production process of an iPhone, human touch is essential because of usability testing outcome.
In conclusion, while robots are advantageous for societal advancement owing to their effect on regular household chores, healthcare and factory floor processes, some still feel that people endanger their lives entirely relying on machines. However, as long as we carefully consider their facilitating role on technological progress, their benefits are clearly positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89105058366 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08476486825 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.747081712062 0.561755894193 133% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6334869429 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136597818669 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389231246099 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408286647066 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731682072707 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205651814181 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.