Some people think that slaying animals for food is brutal and not required Others believe it is an unavoidable part of a diet Which stand do you take

Essay topics:

Some people think that slaying animals for food is brutal and not required. Others believe it is an unavoidable part of a diet. Which stand do you take?

This truth is universally acknowledged fact that everybody has right to live. It is believed we should not kill animals just for the sake of food while others refute this phenomenon. These points of view will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, it is certainly true that non-vegetarian food contains massive amount of proteins, vitamins and minerals which are mandatory in some cold regions. To paraphrase, In Canada, it is essential to eat such sort of food for living in negative temperature during winter season. Inclusively, in some cultures, sea food is equivalent to plant eating in various nations such as Japan, Thailand and so on. Thus, it is a part of some tradition to eat non-vegetarian food. What is more, one cannot get vegetarian food in some western countries where most of the individuals usually like to eat such food which is made from animals meat. Therefore, it is a big reason that many thinkers gravitate towards this point of view.

On the flip side, some people argue that we should not kill to others as we have choice of food. Moreover, there are some religions which are against to eat non-vegetarian food like Sikh religion. In addition, according to the WHO report, people may suffer from various type of ailments just due to the non-vegan food. Nowadays one can get vegan food from almost every nook and corner because transpiration is become advanced in this contemporary era.

After analyzing the aforesaid points, it has been proven that we should have to eat vegetarian food as it has fibre content which removes toxins and eases digestion.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (10 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, sort of, such as, to begin with, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76019372692 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7990946864 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205279558856 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737058221328 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544624353999 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117587076276 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040569529452 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.