Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources, while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe in which we live.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is assumed that space expeditions are futile and lead to waste of resources, while others claim that scientists should research on space as it is important for humanity. I believe that unplanned traveling in space ships for experimental purposes results in wastage of resources. However, organized attempts to reveal hidden sources to meet the need of people is beneficial for humans.
On the one hand, sending space shuttles for experimentation requires billions of dollars of investment. Scientists are not sure while launching a spacecraft that whether the results obtained would be fruitful or not due to lack of planning. So to avoid wastage of money as a result of a failure, this money could be used for the betterment of numerous people who are deprived of basic necessities due to poverty. For illustration, many nations allocate a large portion of the monetary budget on space projects to reveal the mysteries of the universe rather than improving the basic lifestyle of its citizens. Thus, spending assets on an unauthenticated hypothesis is a wasteful practice.
On the other hand, with the everyday rise in population, our planet is running out of resources. This is to say that it has become important for astronauts to find sources on other planets to fulfill human needs. The research should be to find an alternative place on another planet where people can grow food and find land to build houses. For example, there have been authentic evidence that the atmosphere of Mars has a resemblance to that of the earth. Therefore, scientists from all over the world should do cumulative research rather than independent.
To sum up, without sufficient research experimentation in space results in loss of assets while funding of space exploration is vital to save mankind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... of numerous people who are deprived of basic necessities due to poverty. For illustration, many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13993174061 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95386132748 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7234079608 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172888541302 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561703733184 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430397352882 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113581671307 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411248982473 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.