Some people think that students should learn a range of practical skills at school (such as car maintenance or accountancy)
alongside traditional subjects like maths and physics.
Do you agree or disagree with this view?
It is an undeniable fact that practical skills play a pivotal role in the holistic development of children. Therefore, it is
thought by few people that the wide range of practical skills along with academic subjects out to be learned by learners at education institutes. I agree with this view because this notion not only helps students to excel in theoretical subjects in present but also would open the door of numerous career opportunities in future.
To commence with, excellence in academic subjects is the primary reason why practical subjects should be learned by the school-going children. This means to say that learning of non-theoretical skills enriches certain values such as curiosity and thinking out of the box which resultantly have positive impacts on academic performance. For example, as per survey conducted in 2018 by the Oxford University revealed that the problems of mathematics were easily solved by the scholars studying in grade 10 owing to their skill of verbal calculation developed from the practical subject like the account. Thus, it seems clear to say that an approach to learn practical skills helps in academic gain.
Furthermore, another pivotal fact that needs to be considered while discussing importance of practical skills is career opportunity. In other words, if students gain knowledge and experience of practical subjects and theoretical ones, it would play significant role by opening doors of various professions. The best illustration supporting this is that majority of mechanics working in the Honda motors in Canada developed their skill of car maintenance during their formative years as it was their compulsory subject of curriculum. So, it can be said that learning of practical skills at school plays vital role in getting better employment.
In conclusion, while there has been an inconclusive debate about whether the variety of practical skills along with academic subjects should be learned by students at school or not, I believe that it has positive impacts from the perceptive of both academic performance and career development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e door of numerous career opportunities in future. To commence with, excellence in aca...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37272727273 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95675752467 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1828233155 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.75 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33366378867 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122058958814 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505692197951 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180822170367 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712026509045 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.