with an increasing communication via internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become thing of the past. To what extent do you agree?
In the era of technological advancement, a large number of people prefer to communicate through internet and written messaging, Although it is argued by some people that personal face to face communication will become extinct in nearest future, I totally disagree with this view as traditional way of communication is most feasible way and an ideal way to express feelings.
To begin with, in the contemporary world, the digital communication is proved as easiest and fastest way of contacting with each other. Moreover, it saves the time and people can communicate with each other irrespective of their geographical borders. However, all people are not technosavvy so they are not able to access latest technological gadgets and its applications,such as Facebook, Whatsapp and many more. For an example, elderly people are technophobe so they are still depend on others to use technical appliances and internet.
Admittedly, the custom way of communication itself has its own importance. Owing to this, folks can express their feelings with each other in better way. Furthermore, communication with emotions is pivotal to continue bonding between people. For an instance, there a group of people who still prefer to wish birthday and special occasions by meeting each others as they can feel their relations.
In conclusion, it is undeniable fact that communication via internet and text messaging is mostly preferred by majority of people. It does not mean that an old and traditional way of communication will be no more in coming future because it is an ideal way to express feelings and most feasible way for all people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n the era of technological advancement, a large number of people prefer to communicate through in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the nearest'.
Suggestion: in the nearest
... face communication will become extinct in nearest future, I totally disagree with this vi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'access the latest'.
Suggestion: access the latest
...not technosavvy so they are not able to access latest technological gadgets and its applicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , such
...chnological gadgets and its applications,such as Facebook, Whatsapp and many more. Fo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...eople are technophobe so they are still depend on others to use technical appliances a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24045801527 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13748119369 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553435114504 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8662430798 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250771480996 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099978607357 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762082405721 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166198027278 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064976966223 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.