Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Few factions of the society argue that educational institution should focus on teaching more of the real-time oriented sessions than just bookish knowledge. I completely agree with this notion as practical knowledge helps the student to understand the subject more clearly and helps to know the practical situation that is absent in case of sessions carried out between the four walls.
The subjects that are taught in real-time are easy to grasp. This is to say that students, who are taught with the live illustrations understand the topic more quickly and efficiently. For instance, the recent survey conducted by Indian Medical Institute revealed that medical students understand the particular lesson quicker when they are taught and explained in operation theatre with live demonstration than just a theoretical class. This shows how practical exercises can help to understand clearly in a short time.
One more reason worth considering is the effectiveness of the sessions, in other words, the theoretical explanation in class and the practical illustration toward the same subject has a different impact. For example, the learnings in the classroom by architecture students about drawing a structure of the building is less effective than that of constructing a house in a real-time while working on the field. Hence, few educational institutions mandatorily implement every student to undergo apprenticeship or article-ship during their course.
To conclude, theory knowledge is necessary to know the basics of their stream but to have complete mastery over the subject, I believe that institutions should focus more on implementing practical oriented session in their course.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52895752896 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04835485396 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.8284171375 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126180402638 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493282716703 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044719334003 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886405848347 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424852663005 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.