Some People think that using animals for food and transportation should be completely banned. On the other hand, other people believe that using animals for meat and experiments is fair.
Discuss both the views and give your own opinion
In the current scenario, the exploitation of animals by humans has sparked much debate. Some people are of the view that there should be a ban on the utilization of animals for food and transportation while others think that it is fair to use them. I shall discuss both the views in this essay and then give my opinion.
There are umpteen reasons why there should be a prohibition on the usage of animals for domestic purposes. The primary cause is animal cruelty. In other words, animals are killed for the purpose of food. For example, these days, individuals eat all types of non-vegetarian food and to serve the purpose, innocent animals are sacrificed.
Furthermore, people sometimes overuse domestic animals by overloading them with heavy materials like bricks. They are not even given proper food to eat, which leads to the deterioration of their health. For example, livestock such as donkey, horses is used to carry things from one place to another. They are not even given proper nutrition and made them work tirelessly.
Another point is some laboratories for medicines and cosmetic products perform dangerous experiments on various animals and even use their bones in medications and beauty products.
On the other hand, killing animals for meat is not completely wrong. If there is no meat, people will leave only with the option of eating vegetables and this will impact our food chain. As there is a limited supply of crops and vegetables and they alone cannot fulfill the demand and supply requirements of everyone. This will cause a disastrous impact like famine as there will be a scarcity of eatable products.
Also, places such as rural areas do not even have proper transportation facilities like cars and buses and humans have to rely only on the animals to different places. For example, In India, there are many villages where there are less means of transportation and villagers use cow-carts for their travel.
To conclude, using animals has some positives, but its negatives outweigh but banning them is not a solution, so the government should formulate some regulatory authorities to keep the check on the commercial and domestic usage of animals to avoid their exploitation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, while, for example, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0737704918 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74258832807 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.669844718 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7368421053 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461468120283 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136589361296 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130374960392 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213235480352 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122154797562 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.