some people think that watching tv causes weight problems in children.Do you agree with this.
It is thought by some people that weight problems in children are caused by watching tv.
While I agree that excessive hours in front of the TV can contribute to this problem, diet also plays a role. Furthermore weight problems can only be dealt with by talking the issue behind them.
Firstly I think that although watching TV in itself does not actually cause children to gain weight, spending too much time each day sitting in front of the TV without doing exercise can result in weight problems. In other words, inactivity and sedentary lifestyle are directly linked to problems with obesity. Secondly, however, weight problems are also compounded by poor diet consisting of lack of healthy meals and too much processed food containing high levels of fats and sugars. This comes from both children and parents making poor dietary choices which lack fresh wholefoods. Both lack of exercise and poor diet directly contribute to weight problems in children.
There are two obvious solution of dealing with children obesity. One answer is to reduce the amount of inactivity in child’s life by cutting out hours spent either watching TV or on electronic devices and use that time to participate in physical activities. By doing this, children will burn off excess calories which will drastically reduce their weight. Altering a child’s diet is another measure that can be taken to tackle the issue. Parents should be more proactive in producing healthier meals and reducing the amount of junk food available in the house.it might also be sensible to encourage children to take part in the cooking process which ought to ensure they grow up being able to produce their own balanced meals.
In conclusion, by introducing children to sports and other physical activities as well as providing them with the better diet, these measures can counteract the causes of childhood obesity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...o this problem, diet also plays a role. Furthermore weight problems can only be dealt with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10967741935 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58540689721 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9818213979 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392256927382 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141397755868 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135753878115 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258583101123 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1683614429 0.056905535591 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.