Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work ubdependently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Companies should consider a lot of parameters while recruiting new people. Although it is thought by few people that organizations should recruit a person who is innovative and has ability to work alone, others believe that ability to work in team and follow guidelines should be considered during interview. This essay will discuss both views of an argument and state reasons why I agree with former view in trailing paragraphs.
On the one hand, a certain school of thoughts consider innovation and ability to work alone as paramount qualities of a good candidate. This may be due to fact that, in the cut-throat competition, a person should to think out of box to stay ahead in competition in market. Moreover, this type of folks adds more incredible values to the firm to get better results in unfavorable conditions too. For an example, a employee in marketing department can perform better if he can able to understand market scenario and design innovative strategies. Thus, these two qualities play pivotal role while recruitment.
On the other hand, opponents of the above view are in favor of a candidate having ability to work in team and follow instructions. This is because of the fact that there are certain projects where people have to work as team. Owing to this, a candidate having skills such as cooperation, adaptation can perform better to get desired outcome. Furthermore, teamwork creates healthy working environment where everyone can enjoy work by following companies standard operating procedures. For an instance, most of the IT firms prefer to recruit people having ability to perform in a group for their projects. Hence, quality such as ability to work in team is crucial while selection of candidate.
In conclusion, while people have different opinions for selection of candidates, I believe that, in today’s era of competitive market, innovation and ability to work independently are two prime qualities that every employee should have to handle situation and excel in their current roles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...vorable conditions too. For an example, a employee in marketing department can pe...
^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...n team and follow instructions. This is because of the fact that there are certain projects where people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ng procedures. For an instance, most of the IT firms prefer to recruit people having a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18541033435 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88286295679 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7209152097 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.733333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352906039728 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111921754798 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884478527047 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218533675541 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123712406701 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.