There remains a debate about the role of zoos and concern about how they work. Some believe that zoos are brutal and should be banned, while others argue that zoos can have positive contributions for conserve animals. In this essay, I am to discuss both opinions before address my view.
On the one hand, it’s indisputable that numerous zoos are inhuman. These days, it is the profitability, not the conserving purpose, that a large proportion of zoo owners set their sights on. As a mean of making a profit from the public’s curiosity, animals are captivated in cages or limited spaces, treated brutally and live in desperate conditions. Moreover, most of the animals kept in zoos are rare creatures, since they are more attractive to the visitors, abusing those animals means driving them on the verge of extinction. Hence, those cruel zoos should undoubtedly be fallen out of use.
On the other hand, I believe that many other zoos are worthwhile as they make conservation goal priority over the financial purpose. Given that the natural habitats are being ever-increasingly destructed, leaving endangered animals living in the wild may not be the ideal approach. In addition, they are further threatened due to poaching. Kept in legal zoos, wild animals are specially looked after and even provided with preeminent conditions to breed and expand the population size. Galapagos tortoises are a case in point, from a few sparse tortoises to the number of thousands, which is unachievable in the natural ecosystem, thanks to an initiative of keeping them in zoos for several years.
In conclusion, it appears to me that a certain number of zoos, not all, is cruel and hence should be banned. Others, however, are useful in protecting and reserving wild animals from vanishing, which I believe need to keep progressing in such the way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7676246587 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3140308856 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359078117243 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103450184615 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766293954783 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209053642798 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496760316775 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.