Some people like to try new things, for example, places to visit and types of food. Other people prefer to keep doing things they are familiar with.
Discuss both these attitudes and give your own opinion.
There are certain kind of people who are always looking for trying something new in their life. On the other hand, a group of humans only prefer opting usual or common things that are tested before. Both group of people have the reason for their choices, but I believe former kind of people are governing the world.
People who try to use already tested ways are usually more careful in their routine life. They have a point of view that life is too important to risk for something that has not been tested before. Similarly, they think that to visit a new place during vacation is not a good idea, because you may end up not liking the place and that will waste your vacations. Moreover, they believe that opting for the track that was not travelled before may bring an unpleasent event.
On the contrary, there are several people who tend to try innovative ideas. This kind of people are usually more optimistic in their lives and tend to deliver positive vibes. Though trying new things may turn out to be a bad experience, it will still be a good learning. This group of people have a belief that we get the life once and we should get the max out of it. So, we should try different things and lead way for others to follow. Furthermore, it is argued by this kind of people that exploring new places bring sense of achievement which is an important element to keep ourselves motivated.
In my opinion, our world needs both kinds of people to maintain a sound balance in the activities perfomed around the globe. There are several jobs that require people who prefer to work on repetitive tasks. However, I believe that world has grown because of people who tend to risk for trying innovative ideas. We have found several beautiful valleys and discovered continents because of this tendency to go for something new. Similarly, technology has brought a revolution in our way of living and this is all because of executing innovation ideas.
In the conclusion, I would argue that world consists of people who prefer going for innovative ideas, and the people who will try to limit themselves with tested stuff to minimize the risk. I believe both types of people are essential to maintain the healthy balance of activities in the world. However, I am certain that leaders in every field are those who opt for taking risk of trying something different and innovative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
There are certain kind of people who are always looking for tr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, kind of, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69377990431 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40135146583 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464114832536 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.712982676 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.4285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299315236794 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094926524241 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441811155062 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181502936878 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312461935161 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.