Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree

These days, there are many reformed offenders who become productive and valuable to society. Allowing such people to speak to youngsters about how dangerous it is to commit a crime would be the best way to prevent them from breaking the law.

To begin with, counsel based on personal experience are more likely to be accepted by young people. This is due to ex-prisoners experience with prison life and the types of wrongdoing people get involved in. They could share with teenagers how they became involved in crime and the danger of a criminal lifestyle. This would constitute a terrific way to deter younger from committing crimes and help them turn into responsible citizens. Admittedly, this approach might cause to generate a tendency for imitating such activities in the youngster’s mind, especially who lack maturity and curiosity. However, the reformed offenders' share of the consequences for themselves and their families in the prison term, for instance, being shunned by society, would be a major barrier to preventing them from committing wrongdoing.

Alternative methods of educating the young about crime would be significantly less effective. One option would be police officers visiting schools and speaking with students. In this way, teenagers could learn about what happens to criminals after they are caught, but they are frequently reluctant to heed the advice of authority. Another choice would be for teachers to speak to their students about crime, but that would not be well received by students as a reliable source of information. For example, my school, last semester, had an extra-curricular class to provide knowledge about some types of crimes and punishments. This class, there is no doubt, only received the concern of a few students. Finally, while educational movies can be informative, there would be no chance for kids to interact and ask questions.

To recapitulate, I, with no hesitation, believe that those who have turned their lives around after serving a prison sentence would be the best help to assist prevent youthful criminal behavior.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'generating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: generating
.... Admittedly, this approach might cause to generate a tendency for imitating such activitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27245508982 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86017166441 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5635593082 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152390458543 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05348715637 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047529748255 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116144728202 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595822250294 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'generating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: generating
.... Admittedly, this approach might cause to generate a tendency for imitating such activitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27245508982 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86017166441 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5635593082 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152390458543 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05348715637 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047529748255 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116144728202 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595822250294 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.